How We Were Formed

Our group originated from a casual discussion held by a few of us at the Limmud New York Learning conference in January of 2008. We realized there were very few means by which young professionals could effectively navigate and impact the philanthropic world. This struck us as odd, as we all aspired to one day be able to make significant donations, but were unsure when we were supposed to learn how to donate in an intelligent and effective way.

JPEG grew out of a desire to solve both of our problems at once. We recognized that as a group, we could teach each other and learn together about the process of giving. We also saw the practical benefits of giving together: we can effect greater change through a group donation than our small donations can individually.

Since January, we have met regularly and have established a corps of 13 committed members. We have discussed at length our visions for the structure of the group and the kinds of things we each hope to get out of it. We are now beginning to identify the organizations to which our group is interested in contributing.

The issue, of course, is that by entering with only limited information, there is only so much we can teach each other. Part of the learning process we envisioned involves educators from outside the group sharing their knowledge with us. While we possess a lot of energy and enthusiasm, none of us has previous experience participating in a giving circle, donating large sums of money, or teaching these things. We are looking to connect with experienced and inspirational people who can share their wisdom and insights with us, and help prepare a new generation of philanthropists.


Thursday, November 6, 2008

Economic crisis and the giving response

Ruthie taught us about how "the end of the world as we know it" (read: the critical state of today's economy) affects the philanthropic world in a major way.

We learned about the massive hit charities took both from a loss in individual gifts from donors as well as from endowments.

Finally, Ruthie shared with us some Judaic sources on our obligation to giving; namely, our obligation to give regardless of the circumstances (though not to the point where we ourselves become impoverished).

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Meeting with Naomi Levine

Last Wednesday evening, 8 members of JPEG had the unique opportunity to meet with Naomi Levine, the chair and academic director of the Heyman Center for Philanthropy and Fundraising at NYU. We spoke with her about her career, values, and views on philanthropy. Everyone who attended agrees: the experience was phenomenal. We all feel very privileged to have been able to chat with someone so knowledgeable and influential in the philanthropic world.

Thank you to all who helped make this meeting possible!

Highlights from the meeting to follow.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Domestic Abuse Prevention Charities Selected

We have completed yet another round of narrowing down our charities. The two DV charities that we will further consider for our donation are Shalom Task Force and the NYC Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project.

Group Learning: Emily Highlights the Talmud's Views on Our Obligation to Give

The texts used in the discussion were Deuteronomy 15: 7-8; and Talmud Tractate Ketutbot 67B.

The question posed to the group was, "What does it mean to give charity to a person according to that person’s own need?"

R’ Hillel provided status of wealth as a form of charity for a formerly wealthy man, to give to him according to that man’s need. The text raised all types of questions about what it means to give charity to people other than impoverished people. Should we support formerly rich people to help them live as they are accustomed to live, or do we expect people to live according to modest standards? How do we justify giving charity to all types of organizations when there are truly impoverished people in the world? Does all charity need to go to the poorest people, or is there a value in supporting people and causes that deal with people from a variety of socio-economic circumstances?

Thanks to Emily for sparking some lively and very thought provoking debate.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Israel Charities

JPEG has completed its second round of charity discussions and has selected three Israeli charities we plan to consider further.  Our top three Israeli charities are: Gesher, Shutaf), and Yad Eliezer.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Education Component: Amy teaches us about the nuances of giving.

At out most recent meeting JPEG member, Amy Schiller, facilitated a learning conversation about strategic philanthropy. This conversation served a dual role, giving us food for thought about how to be more strategic with our individual giving, as well providing us with a shared language about different philanthropic strategies as they relate to our group's grantmaking.

To illustrate her points, Amy shared two excerpts from Inspired Philanthropy, written by philanthropic advisor, Tracy Gary (www.inspiredlegacies.org).

Idea #1 Moving from "obligatory giving" to "inspired giving"

Here's the quick summary. Most of us give most of our charitable dollars to organizations we feel socially obligated to give to and give far less money to organizations we are most passionate about and which we believe have the power to be truly transformative.

Part of the process of us become more strategic in our individual giving involves turning this model upside down. This means investing the bulk of our philanthropic dollars with organizations we believe to be transformative and which we are most passionate about. Gifts we feel personally or socially obligated to make can still make the cut, but should be minimized.

Idea #2 Tracy Gary's Levels of Philanthropic Intervention

  • Needs Philanthropy (immediate and recurring needs)
  • Empowerment Philanthropy (empowers individuals to care for themselves)
  • Capacity-Building Philanthropy (expansion of services or growth of numbers served)
  • Systemic Philanthropy (develop systemic solutions to collective problems)

JPEG talked about the challenges and opportunities of each of the philanthropic levels. This shared language will be useful to us as we continue to evaluate prospective grantee organizations.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Education Charities

We have successfully narrowed down the education charities to which JPEG might donate.  The two charities (down from eight) we are considering further are Jumpstart (www.jstart.org) and Citizen Schools (www.citizenschools.org)