How We Were Formed
The issue, of course, is that by entering with only limited information, there is only so much we can teach each other. Part of the learning process we envisioned involves educators from outside the group sharing their knowledge with us. While we possess a lot of energy and enthusiasm, none of us has previous experience participating in a giving circle, donating large sums of money, or teaching these things. We are looking to connect with experienced and inspirational people who can share their wisdom and insights with us, and help prepare a new generation of philanthropists.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Economic crisis and the giving response
We learned about the massive hit charities took both from a loss in individual gifts from donors as well as from endowments.
Finally, Ruthie shared with us some Judaic sources on our obligation to giving; namely, our obligation to give regardless of the circumstances (though not to the point where we ourselves become impoverished).
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Meeting with Naomi Levine
Thank you to all who helped make this meeting possible!
Highlights from the meeting to follow.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Domestic Abuse Prevention Charities Selected
Group Learning: Emily Highlights the Talmud's Views on Our Obligation to Give
The question posed to the group was, "What does it mean to give charity to a person according to that person’s own need?"
R’ Hillel provided status of wealth as a form of charity for a formerly wealthy man, to give to him according to that man’s need. The text raised all types of questions about what it means to give charity to people other than impoverished people. Should we support formerly rich people to help them live as they are accustomed to live, or do we expect people to live according to modest standards? How do we justify giving charity to all types of organizations when there are truly impoverished people in the world? Does all charity need to go to the poorest people, or is there a value in supporting people and causes that deal with people from a variety of socio-economic circumstances?
Thanks to Emily for sparking some lively and very thought provoking debate.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Israel Charities
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Education Component: Amy teaches us about the nuances of giving.
At out most recent meeting JPEG member, Amy Schiller, facilitated a learning conversation about strategic philanthropy. This conversation served a dual role, giving us food for thought about how to be more strategic with our individual giving, as well providing us with a shared language about different philanthropic strategies as they relate to our group's grantmaking.
To illustrate her points, Amy shared two excerpts from Inspired Philanthropy, written by philanthropic advisor, Tracy Gary (www.inspiredlegacies.org).
Idea #1 Moving from "obligatory giving" to "inspired giving"
Here's the quick summary. Most of us give most of our charitable dollars to organizations we feel socially obligated to give to and give far less money to organizations we are most passionate about and which we believe have the power to be truly transformative.
Part of the process of us become more strategic in our individual giving involves turning this model upside down. This means investing the bulk of our philanthropic dollars with organizations we believe to be transformative and which we are most passionate about. Gifts we feel personally or socially obligated to make can still make the cut, but should be minimized.
Idea #2 Tracy Gary's Levels of Philanthropic Intervention
- Needs Philanthropy (immediate and recurring needs)
- Empowerment Philanthropy (empowers individuals to care for themselves)
- Capacity-Building Philanthropy (expansion of services or growth of numbers served)
- Systemic Philanthropy (develop systemic solutions to collective problems)
JPEG talked about the challenges and opportunities of each of the philanthropic levels. This shared language will be useful to us as we continue to evaluate prospective grantee organizations.