How We Were Formed

Our group originated from a casual discussion held by a few of us at the Limmud New York Learning conference in January of 2008. We realized there were very few means by which young professionals could effectively navigate and impact the philanthropic world. This struck us as odd, as we all aspired to one day be able to make significant donations, but were unsure when we were supposed to learn how to donate in an intelligent and effective way.

JPEG grew out of a desire to solve both of our problems at once. We recognized that as a group, we could teach each other and learn together about the process of giving. We also saw the practical benefits of giving together: we can effect greater change through a group donation than our small donations can individually.

Since January, we have met regularly and have established a corps of 13 committed members. We have discussed at length our visions for the structure of the group and the kinds of things we each hope to get out of it. We are now beginning to identify the organizations to which our group is interested in contributing.

The issue, of course, is that by entering with only limited information, there is only so much we can teach each other. Part of the learning process we envisioned involves educators from outside the group sharing their knowledge with us. While we possess a lot of energy and enthusiasm, none of us has previous experience participating in a giving circle, donating large sums of money, or teaching these things. We are looking to connect with experienced and inspirational people who can share their wisdom and insights with us, and help prepare a new generation of philanthropists.


Tuesday, December 16, 2008

And the winners are . . .

The members of JPEG are thrilled to announce that we have selected the charities to which we will be making our grants.

From the 60 or so with which we started, we narrowed it down to 13 finalists. We contacted each organization and developed an in depth profile of their financial situation, their work, their long term goals, and their organizational philosophy.

After nearly a month of research, introspection, and much discussion, we decided to award each of the following organizations $1000 to help them continue the outstanding work they do.

The grant recipients are:

1) Citizen Schools: Citizen Schools operates a national network of apprenticeship programs for middle school students, connecting adult volunteers to young people in hands-on learning projects after school. At Citizen Schools, students develop the academic and leadership skills they need to do well in school, get into college, and become leaders in their careers and in their communities. We run our programs at 44 locations in seven states, serving an estimated 4,500 students and engaging approximately 3,200 volunteers. But we aim for even larger impact. Our program is a model of how out-of-school time can be a powerful opportunity to re-imagine learning, bring communities together, and increase access to the American Dream. Through unique volunteer engagement, staffing strategies, program models, and advocacy, Citizen Schools is at the forefront of a movement to transform education.

2) Footsteps: Footsteps provides educational, vocational and social support to those seeking to enter or explore the world beyond the insular ultra-religious communities in which they were raised. People from the ultra-orthodox and Chasidic communities who choose to enter mainstream America currently do so as new immigrants in every sense. They face cultural disorientation and isolation coupled with a lack of practical and marketable skills. Founded in December 2003, Footsteps aims to assist individuals who choose to make this difficult transition.

3) Shalom Task Force: Shalom Task Force is a leading social service organization that aims to promote healthy marriages and peaceful relationships. They maintain a domestic abuse hotline, educational programs for young women and men, workshops for engaged couples and provides professional training for Rabbis, Kallah (bride) teachers and mental health professionals.

Thank you so much to all the JPEG members for their outstanding effort, collaboration, and charity. We are thrilled to have completed this giving cycle and are interested in starting anew in the coming months.

If you are interested in contributing to any of these organizations along with us, or in becoming a member of JPEG or starting your own philanthropy circle, please contact us at the email address listed at the bottom of the page.

Additionally, if you are interested in learning more, members of JPEG will be presenting at the 2008 Limmud NY Learning Conference over Martin Luther King weekend. For information on attending the convention, please follow this link.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Developing Nations Charities Have Been Selected

We have finally completed our initial round of philanthropy selection!

The developing nations organizations that we are considering further are: Carolina for Kibera (http://cfk.unc.edu/index.php), American Jewish World Service (AJWS) (http://ajws.org/), and Global Partnership for Afghanistan (http://www.gpfa.org/).



We are thrilled to have found so many outstanding charities doing so many incredible things out there. Now, from these 13 charirities, we will begin the difficult process of selecting only 1 or 2 to which we will make our gift.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

We have selected our three semi-finalists from the category "Jewish People/Jewish World"

We have selected our three top organizations from the Jewish world. The organizations that we will further consider for our grant are: Matan (www.matankids.org), Moving Traditions (http://www.movingtraditions.org/index.php), and Footsteps (http://www.footstepsorg.org/).

Thank you to everyone who brought in all of these amazing organizations!

Economic crisis and the giving response

Ruthie taught us about how "the end of the world as we know it" (read: the critical state of today's economy) affects the philanthropic world in a major way.

We learned about the massive hit charities took both from a loss in individual gifts from donors as well as from endowments.

Finally, Ruthie shared with us some Judaic sources on our obligation to giving; namely, our obligation to give regardless of the circumstances (though not to the point where we ourselves become impoverished).

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Meeting with Naomi Levine

Last Wednesday evening, 8 members of JPEG had the unique opportunity to meet with Naomi Levine, the chair and academic director of the Heyman Center for Philanthropy and Fundraising at NYU. We spoke with her about her career, values, and views on philanthropy. Everyone who attended agrees: the experience was phenomenal. We all feel very privileged to have been able to chat with someone so knowledgeable and influential in the philanthropic world.

Thank you to all who helped make this meeting possible!

Highlights from the meeting to follow.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Domestic Abuse Prevention Charities Selected

We have completed yet another round of narrowing down our charities. The two DV charities that we will further consider for our donation are Shalom Task Force and the NYC Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project.

Group Learning: Emily Highlights the Talmud's Views on Our Obligation to Give

The texts used in the discussion were Deuteronomy 15: 7-8; and Talmud Tractate Ketutbot 67B.

The question posed to the group was, "What does it mean to give charity to a person according to that person’s own need?"

R’ Hillel provided status of wealth as a form of charity for a formerly wealthy man, to give to him according to that man’s need. The text raised all types of questions about what it means to give charity to people other than impoverished people. Should we support formerly rich people to help them live as they are accustomed to live, or do we expect people to live according to modest standards? How do we justify giving charity to all types of organizations when there are truly impoverished people in the world? Does all charity need to go to the poorest people, or is there a value in supporting people and causes that deal with people from a variety of socio-economic circumstances?

Thanks to Emily for sparking some lively and very thought provoking debate.