How We Were Formed

Our group originated from a casual discussion held by a few of us at the Limmud New York Learning conference in January of 2008. We realized there were very few means by which young professionals could effectively navigate and impact the philanthropic world. This struck us as odd, as we all aspired to one day be able to make significant donations, but were unsure when we were supposed to learn how to donate in an intelligent and effective way.

JPEG grew out of a desire to solve both of our problems at once. We recognized that as a group, we could teach each other and learn together about the process of giving. We also saw the practical benefits of giving together: we can effect greater change through a group donation than our small donations can individually.

Since January, we have met regularly and have established a corps of 13 committed members. We have discussed at length our visions for the structure of the group and the kinds of things we each hope to get out of it. We are now beginning to identify the organizations to which our group is interested in contributing.

The issue, of course, is that by entering with only limited information, there is only so much we can teach each other. Part of the learning process we envisioned involves educators from outside the group sharing their knowledge with us. While we possess a lot of energy and enthusiasm, none of us has previous experience participating in a giving circle, donating large sums of money, or teaching these things. We are looking to connect with experienced and inspirational people who can share their wisdom and insights with us, and help prepare a new generation of philanthropists.


Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Group Learning: Emily Highlights the Talmud's Views on Our Obligation to Give

The texts used in the discussion were Deuteronomy 15: 7-8; and Talmud Tractate Ketutbot 67B.

The question posed to the group was, "What does it mean to give charity to a person according to that person’s own need?"

R’ Hillel provided status of wealth as a form of charity for a formerly wealthy man, to give to him according to that man’s need. The text raised all types of questions about what it means to give charity to people other than impoverished people. Should we support formerly rich people to help them live as they are accustomed to live, or do we expect people to live according to modest standards? How do we justify giving charity to all types of organizations when there are truly impoverished people in the world? Does all charity need to go to the poorest people, or is there a value in supporting people and causes that deal with people from a variety of socio-economic circumstances?

Thanks to Emily for sparking some lively and very thought provoking debate.

No comments: